Path: rQ!rQdQ!remarQ73!supernews.com!remarQ.com!worldfeed.news.gte.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!193.190.198.38!news.belnet.be!newshub.bart.net!news.bart.net!news.bart.net!not-for-mail
From: Karin Spaink <anonymous@nym.cypherpunks.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology,alt.scientology
Subject: Power Processes
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:06:30 -0500
Organization: bART Internet Services
Lines: 966
Message-ID: <36E449E6.6D98248@nym.cypherpunks.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mickey.2005.bart.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: freyja.bart.nl 920908903 20701 194.158.161.8 (8 Mar 1999 16:01:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bart.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 1999 16:01:43 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: rQ alt.religion.scientology:548509 alt.clearing.technology:68720

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

                      HCO BULLETIN OF 11 MAY, AD 15 [1965]

      By Hand
      Saint Hill Only

                             SCIENTOLOGY VII

                           Confidential Issue

                       Qualificatians Division Only

                          (Star-rated Checkout)

                           THE POWER PROCESSES


      There are three Power Processes being run at this time.

      They are known as the Source, Existence, and the Conditions
      Process.

                               I - Source

             Definition:  SOURCE:  that from which something comes
      or develops; place of origin; cause.

                         Source Process Commands

             1.  Tell me a source.
             2.  Tell me about it.
             3.  Tell me a no source.
             4.  Tell me about it.

                      Flattening the Source Process

      The Source Process is ended when the preclear exper-
      iences brightness and solidity changes in the auditing room.
      The preclear will comment that the room is brighter and more
      solid.

                   Source Process Clearing of Commands

             1.  Clear the word "source" and the word "no source"
                 by having the preclear look up the definition in the
                   dictionary.
             2.  Clear the command, "Tell me a source."
             3.  Clear the command, "Tell me a no source."
             4.  Clear the command, "Tell me about it."


                      THEORY OF THE SOURCE PROCESS

             The Source Process is used to get a preclear not only to
      answer the auditing command and tel1 where it is coming from,
      but also to handle the preclear on the entire scale from NO
      SOURCE to TOTAL SOURCE to AWARENESS OF SOURCES.

                          The No-Source Case

             One of the lowest levels of cases is the case who has
      never caused anything and who does not recognize that anyone
      else can cause things.  This case is one of totally fixed
      attention units, all of which are completely fixated on some-
      thing which is not there, but which is meaningful and male-
      volent; therefore, this case has sought the refuge of the
      non-existence of source to avail this something.  To such a
      case there is no existence, and no conditions.  Recognizing
      no source, this preclear, therefore, has no auditor, is not
      himself there either, and of course, has never done anything.
      Preclears in this state can quite easily admit to having done
      most anything because in actuality they have not ever done
      anything.

             Further cases at NO SOURCE have no awareness of any
      emotion or sensation although they can exhibit physically
      the manifestations of emotion and sensation, but their
      awareness of doing so is nil or at the most a slight curio-
      sity that their bodies are reacting in an odd manner. Every-
      thing is pointless to such a case as there is NO SOURCE and
      therefore no way to effect any changes.  Such a case is self-
      invalidative, irresponsible, and speaks in total generalities,
      such reflecting the no source of causation.  This person, too,
      is haunted by ghosts, delusions, and false beings all of which
      are phenomena of no source.  The individual is quite theety-
      weety.

             The perception of such a case as the NO SOURCE case
      is that the environment is either rather dark or transparent.
      An auditor to get reality concerning how the world looks to
      such a case should look at the reflection of a room as mirrored
      in a window.

                          The Total Source Case

             Up scale to a degree from the NO SOURCE case is the
      TOTAL SOURCE CASE, the case which is pretending to be total
      source when obviously the person is not.  Here we have the
      megalomaniac, the self-assertive case, the pathological
      braggart, and the guilt case.  Such cases think they cause
      everything or pretend to cause everything or think they have
      caused things they haven't or pretend to cause things which
      they haven't.  Such cases are continuously making false assign-
      ments or cause.  Such cases tend in two directions - because
      they are "cause of everything", they are guilty for all that
      has happened or is happening or because they are "cause of
      everything", they are in a state of fighting everyone else in
      their environment as fancied threats to their own false cause.
      In the latter case, falls the paranoid who is certain that he
      is being "done-in" because he is so important that the "FBI is
      after him".  Such a case, if he recognizes other source at
      all, recognizes it only as a threat to him or as a bad causa-
      tion which only he can right.

             Usually such cases as the TOTAL SOURCE case flip-flops
      between the two extremes in his considerations - "he is
      either a guilty, horrible, blameworthy creature" or "he is a
      genius, a fantastic being whom others are trying to get at".

             In auditing such a case as the TOTAL SOURCE case, the
      auditor for this preclear does not exist either, as such a
      preclear can admit of no other source or if the auditor does
      exist, the auditor is only to this preclear a source of dis-
      traction or a source of bad cause.  If he is in propitiation
      to the auditor, it will be those "above the auditor" who are
      the source of bad cause.

             What the auditor must recognize and know about both the
      NO SOURCE case and the TOTAL SOURCE case and the various har-
      monics of such as dramatized on various dynamics is that
      neither case can as-is either because there is no source at
      all or because source is mis-assigned.  As-isness can only
      occur with the proper assignment of source or authorship.
      Since the ability to perceive source is the key to solving
      problems, such people have enormous numbers or problems, but
      never seem to describe the real problem; thus they seem quite
      baffling.

             Definitions:  ATTENTION UNIT: A theta energy quantity
      of awareness existing in the mind in varying quantity from
      person to person.

                           FIXED ATTENTION UNITS: Attention units
      which are caught somewhere down tne time track in one incident
      or another in the form of entheta.

                           GENERALITY:  A general or nonspecific
      statement which is applicable to all and used in Scientology
      to connotate a statement made in an effort to either hide
      cause or to overwhelm another person with the all-inclus1ve.

                           MEGALOMANIAC:  A person who has delusions
      of grandeur, wealth, power, etc.

                           DELUSION:  A belief in something which is
      contrary to fact or reality resulting from deception, mis-
      conception, or misassignment.

                           PARANOID:  A person with delusions,
      as of grandeur or, especially, persecution.


                             II - EXISTENCE

             Definition:   EXISTENCE:  An existing state or fact of
      being; life; living; continuance of being; an occurrence;
      specific manifestation.

                       Existence Process Commands

             1.  What is?
             2.  What isn't.

                    Flattening the Existence Process

             The Existence Process is ended when the preclear gets
      into present time.  Some preclears are "stuck in present
      time".  In such cases they will begin answering in present
      time and then cycle back on the time track and back into
      present time, many times repeating the cycle from present
      to past to present to past to present, each time going less
      far into the past until they are finally "in present time"
      for many commands.

                 Existence Process Clearing of Commands

             1.  Clear the word "is" and clear the word "Isn't"
                 by having the preclear look up the definition in
                 the dictionary.
             2.  Clear the question, "What is?"
             3.  Clear the question, "What isn't?"


                     THEORY OF THE EXISTENCE PROCESS

             The Existence Process is used to unburden the engram
      the preclear is stuck in so the preclear can appear to come
      to present time.  This process handles obsessive pretence,
      chronic alter-is, and dub-in, both in present time and an
      the track or objective dub-in and subjective dub-in.

             With the Source Process, the auditor improved the pre-
      clear's ability to be aware of the sources of things.  Now
      with the Existence Process, the auditor is to improve the
      pre-clear's ability to be aware of the existence of the actual
      and the non-existence of the inactual.  This process removes
      the extraneous incidents off the engram in which the preclear
      is stuck so that the preclear apparently comes to present time.

             Definitions:  PRETENCE: A claim, profession, or alle-
      gation which is falsely made or assumed or stated.

                           AS - ISNESS:  This is the basic state-
      ment of Reality in Scientology and one of its major contri-
      butions.  Instead of puzzling as to WHO made the universe or
      WHAT made it, the Scientologist simply perceives that it IS.
      However, if you attempt to erase an "engram that didn't
      happen" (dub-in) or get relief by running a problem  that never
      existed, there is no case gain.  Why?  Because one can only
      confront or erase what IS, not an alteration of what IS.
      To AS - IS something is to look at it AS it IS really, with-
      out decoration, excuse, embellishment, dub-in, lies, twists,
      and all that.  The alterations prevent the erasure of the
      actual IS - NESS of the existence or the past or a problem,
      etc.  One has to confront the truth of it without twists to
      erase it.

             A preclean who twists things, looks at birds when they
      are chickens, was "punished every day" when none touched him,
      can not erase any part of the bank.  Thus, one sees no TA or
      improvement.  The pc is working on fantasy or reputational
      excuses and isn't AS - ISing.  This must be cured before a
      preclear can make any real gains,  The way to handle it is by
      getting the preclear to gradually came to looking at things
      as they are.  When the preclear can do this, he or she can
      now "AS - IS", which is to say, erase bank by looking at
      This is the purpose of the Existence Process.  The pc does
      not have to understand why it works to have it work.  It
      just works.

                           ALTER - IS:  To introduce a change,
      and therefore time and persistence into an AS - IS - NESS
      to obtain persistency.  An Introduction of an alter - is is,
      therefore, the addition of a lie to the real which causes
      it to persist and not to blow or as-is.

                           OBJECTIVE DUB-IN: The manifestation of
      putting, unknowingly, perceptions which do not in actual fact
      exist, in the environment.

                           SUBJECTIVE DUB-IN:  The manifestation
      of putting, unknowingly, perceptions which do not in actual
      fact exist, into incidents on the time track.


                            III - CONDITIONS

             Definition:  CONDITIONS: Anything called for as a re-
      quirement bedsore the performance, completion, or effectiveness
      of something else; provision, stipulation.  Anything essen-
      tial to the existence or occurrence of something else; any-
      thing that modifies or restricts the nature, existence, or
      occurrence of something else; external circumstances or fac-
      tors.  Manner or state of being.  Proper or healthy state.

                       Conditions Process Commands

             1.  Tell me an existing condition.
             2.  Tell me how you handled it.

                    Flattening the Conditions Process

             The Conditions Process is ended when the preclear has
      a revivification or the engram in which they are stuck on
      the time track.  It is preceded at times by anaten or a
      secondary engram (misemotional) or both,

                 Conditions Process Clearing of Commands

             1.  Clear the words, "existing" and "condition" by
      having the preclear look up the definition in the dictionary.

             2.  Clear the command, "Tell me an existing condition."

             3.  Clear the wod "handled" by having the preclear
      look up the definition in the dictionary.

             4.  Clear the command, "Tell me how you handled


                    THEORY OF THE CONDITIONS PROCESS

             The Conditions Process handles the engram the preclear
      is stuck in and knocks apart the stuck point an the time track
      It is aimed at the preclear who is out of present time, but
      who is fighting a back track enemy as though it was in present
      time, and who is, therefore, solving a problem in present time
      which has ceased to exist in life.  Because of this, the pre-
      clear is hostile, covert, and antagonistic.

             The case of the continuing overts in present time is
      resolved with the Conditions Process.  All of this case's
      continual overts in present time are efforts to solve the
      engram in which the preclear is stuck.

             The Conditions Process results in a revivification of
      this engram in which the preclear is stuck and thereby frees
      the individual on the time track so he can now really be in
      present time.

             While the preclear will recall or remember many inci-
      dents, and while he seems to be in many, he is, in actual
      fact only in ONE and has been there for a long time with
      other incidents piling up on it.  The pc will eventually
      REVIVIFY (relive) the actual engram briefly and come for the
      first time to present time.  That is the end of the process.

             A secondary (misemotional incident) has to have an
      engram (a moment of pain and unconsciousness) under it to be
      a secondary and remain in place.  That 1s why it is called a
      "secondary".  A preclear commonly goes through the secondary
      (misemotiona1) charge hours or a couple of auditing days be-
      fore he revivifies.  Thus the appearance of a secondary is
      a sign that one is approaching THE engram.

             One does not run the secondary or engram as an auditor.
      One just goes on running the Conditions Process commands.  It
      is a severe goof to stop or change processes just because the
      pc has hit a secondary or the key engram.  One runs the pro-
      cess exactly.  When the pc revivifies a few more commands
      usually gets him into PT and ends tne process.  It is a
      severe goof to overrun or underrun the process.

                                End Words

             Sometimes persons who couldn't run R-6 well have had
      end words fly off for a while when audited on one or another
      of the Power Processes.  This soon ceases and the pc runs
      quite normally.  It's just their R-6 auditing coming off.

             However, the major symptom of overrunning the process
      is that the pc, his "Time Track" blown by a revivification,
      begins to audit off real end words much like R-6-EW.

             If a pc has revivified and the process is overrun it
      can become quite severe in reaction as the pc will stck into
      the R-6 bank!  However, a preclear can be overrun for several
      days without being smashed.  But don't do it.

                           Further Definitions

             PRESENT TIME:  The time which is now and which becomes
      the past almost as rapidly as it is observed.  It is a term
      loosely applied to the environment existing in now, as in
      "preclear came up to present time", meaning the preclear be-
      came aware of the existing matter, energy, space, and time of
      now.  The point on anyone's time track where his physical body
      (if alive) may be found.  "Now".

             STUCK IN PRESENT TIME:  The condition of a person being
      incapable of moving on the time track into the past.  In
      actuality the preclear is in some incident which forces him
      to be in the apparent present.

             REVIVIFICATION: The bringing back to life of an engram
      in which a preclear is stuck.  The engram or some portion
      thereof is being acted out in present time by the preclean.
      It is called a revivification because the engram is suddenly
      more real to the preclear than present time has ever been.
      He re-lives that moment briefly.  He does no". merely reecall
      or remember it.

             AN ENGRAM: A mental image picture of an experience
      containing pain, unconsciousness, and a real or fancied
      threat to survival; it is a recording in the mind of some-
      thing which actually happened to the preclear in the past
      which contained pain and unconsciousness, both of which are
      recorded in the mental image picture called an engram.

             ANATEN: A composite of two words, "analytical attenua-
      tion", or partial or complete dilution or weakening of the
      functions of the analytical mind.  The preclear goes
      "unconscious" for a moment in the session.

             A SECONDARY:  A secondary engram is a mental image
      picture of a moment in the past containing misemotion - anger,
      fear, grief, apathy - where loss either is threatened or
      accomplished.  However, a secondary can not exist unless an
      engram underlies it.

             TIME TRACK:  The consecutive mental image pictures
      recording the consecutive moments of "now" through which the
      individual has lived.  It consists of locks, secondaries, and
      engrams.

                                                L. RON HUBBARD

      LRH:msh:cs
      Copyright (c) 1965
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





                                 GRADE V

                             POWER PROCESSES

                                ALL FLOWS


      PR PR 1

           Fl.  1.  What has another done to you?
                2.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?
                3.  What hasn't another said to you?
                4.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?

           F2.  1.  What have you done to another?
                2.  What problem were you trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't you said to another?
                4.  What problem were you trying to solve?

           F3.  1.  What has another done to another or others?
                2.  What problem were they trying to solve?
                3.  What hasn't another said to another or others?
                4.  What problem were they trying to solve?

           F0.  1.  What have you done to yourself?
                2.  What problem were you trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't you said to yourself?
                4.  What problem were you trying to solve?

      PR PR 2

           Give me some practices, opinions or beliefs you have been
      connected to, whether you left them or not.  Run reading items.

           Fl.  1.  What condition have you encountered in/with
                    ______________?
                2.  How have you handled it?

           F2.  1.  What condition has another encountered in/with
                    ______________? 
                2.  Now has he/she handled it?

           F3.  1.  What condition have others encountered in/with
                    ______________?
                2.  How have they handled at?

           F0.  1.  What condition have you encountered with your-
                    self because of ______________?
                2.  How have you handled it?

      PR PR 3

           For those overwhelmed by a clearing practice.

           Fl.  1.  What condition have you encountered in Sciento-
                    logy (or auditing, clearing, educting, Eductivism
                    EST, or Dianetics)?
                2.  How have you handled it?

           F2.  1.  What condition has another encountered in
                    Scientology (or auditing, clearing, educting,
                    Eductivism, EST or Dianetics)?
                2.  How has he/she handled it?

           F3.  1.  What condition have others encountered in
                    Scientology (auditing, clearing, educting,
                    Eductivism, EST or Dianetics)?
                2.  How have they handled it?

           F0.  1.  What condition have you encountered in your-
                    self because of Scientology (auditing, clearing,
                    educting, Eductivism, EST or Dianetics)?
                2.  How have you handled it?

      PR PR 4

           Fl.  1.  Tell me a source.
                2.  Tell me about it.
                3.  Tell me a no-source.
                4.  Tell me about it.

           F2.  1.  Tell me a source for another.
                2.  Tell me about it.
                3.  Tell me a no-source for another.
                4.  Tell me about it.

           F3.  1.  Tell me a source for others.
                2.  Tell me about it.
                3.  Tell me a no-source for others.
                4.  Tell me about it.

           F0.  1.  Tell me about yourself as a source.
                2.  Tell me about it.
                3.  Tell me about yourself as a no-source.
                4.  Tell me about it.

      PR PR 5

           Fl.  1.  What is?
                2.  What isn't?

           F2.  1.  What is for another?
                2.  What isn't for another?

           F3.  1.  What is for others?
                2.  What isn't for others?

           F0.  1.  What is for yourself?
                2.  What isn't far yourself?

      PR PR 6
       
           Fl.  1.  Tell me an existing condition.
                2.  Tell me how you have handled it.

           F2.  1.  Tell me an existing condition for another.
                2.  Tell me how he/she has handled it.

           F3.  1.  Tell me an existing condition for others.
                2.  Tell me how they have handled it.

           F0.  1.  Tell me an existing condition in yourself.
                2.  Tell me how you have handled it.


                                GRADE VA

                          POWER PLUS PROCESSES

                                ALL FLOWS

      1B

           L & N to first B.D. Item.
           What person have you known?
           Run terminal in following processes.

           F1.  1.  What has _________ done for you?
                2.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?
                3.  What hasn't __________ said to you?
                4.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?

           F2.  1.  What have you done to _________ ?
                2.  What problem were you trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't you said to ________ ?
                4.  What problem were you trying to solve?

           F3.  1.  What has __________ done to others?
                2.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?
                3.  What hasn't __________ said to others?
                4.  What problem was he/she trying to salve?

           F3A. 1.  What have others done to __________ ?
                2.  What problem were they trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't others said to ________ ?
                4.  What problem were they trying to solve?

           F0.  1.  What have you done to yourself because of _______?
                2.  What problem were you trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't you said to yourself because
                    of __________?
                4.  What problem were you trying to solve?

      1C
           L & N to first B.D. Item.
           What place have you known?
           Run the place found in the following processes.

           Fl.  1.  What has another done to you in _________?
                2.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?
                3.  What hasn't another said to you in _________?
                4.  What problem was he/she trying to solve?

           F2.  1.  What have you done to another in _________?
                2.  What problem were you trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't you said to another in _________?
                4.  What problem were you trying to solve.

           F3.  1.  What has another done to another in _________?
                2.  What problem were they trying to solve?
                3.  What hasn't another said to others in _________?
                4.  What problem were they trying to solve?

           F0.  1.  What have you done to yourself in _________?
                2.  What problem were you trying to solve?
                3.  What haven't you said to yourself in _________?
                4.  What problem were you trying to solve?

      1D
           L & N to first B.D. Item.
           What subject would you like to know more about?
           Run the subject found in the same processes as given
           in 1C (places), Quad Flow.


                    THE POWER PROCESSES
       
                      L. Ron Hubbard

      POWER PROCESS 1

           (a)  What overt have you committed?
           (b)  What problem were you trying to solve?
           (c)  What haven't you said?
           (d)  What problem were you trying to solve?

      Run the above when there is no TA action on PrPr 4
      or when the PC is committing present time overts.
      A continuing overt Case is committing overts as a
      solution.  Continue the process until a floating
      needle or there is no more TA action.  Then go on
      to PrPr 4 (source).

      POWER PROCESS 2

           (a)  "Give me some practices, opinions, or
      beliefs you have been connected to whether you left
      them or not".  Run to the first blowdown item.

           (b)  Then take the blowdown item plus the two
      items up and two items down from it and assess those
      five items to one.

           (c)  Run on the item; 1.  What condition have you
      encountered in ____________?  2.  How have you
      handled it?  Run until good indicators, major win, or
      F.N.

      POWER PROCESS 3

           (a)  What condition have you encountered in
      Scientology (or auditing or dianetics)?
           (b)  How have you handled it?

      Run to a major cognition, goad indicators, or F.N.

      Power processes 1, 2, and 3 are corrective processes
      and are used when the P.C. is not running well on
      Pr Pr 4, 5, or 6.  Power Process 2 is used when the
      pc brings up end words on PrPr5 and is collapsed into
      his bank by former practices.  PrPr 3 is used when
      the pc has been destroyed by auditing or the organ-
      ization.


      POWER PROCESS 4

           (a)  Tell me a source.
           (b)  Tell me about it.
           (c)  Tell me a no source.
           (d)  Tell me about it.

      The words source, no source and the phrases should
      be cleared with a dictionary before runninc the
      process.  The end phenomena of this process in that
      the colors in the room seem brighter and the walls
      more solid.  Run to this point or to F.N.

      POWER PROCESS 5

           (a)  What is?
           (b)  What isn't?

      Clear the words with a dictionary with pc on the cans.
      Run to a floating needle or 3 consecutive answers in
      present time.  If pc gives dichotomies (i.e.,
      good-bad etc.), go immediately to PrPr 2.

      POWER PROCESS 6

            (a)  Tell me an existing condition.
            (b)  Tell me how you've handled it.

      Run to a revivification of the incident that the
      pc is dramatising or to a floating needle.





      HCOB 06JUN66 - 1AA 5A

       PROPOSED CONFIDENTIAL HCO BULLETIN OF 6-6-66

                        PROCESS 1AA

      The commands of the process 1AA are as follows:-

           What have you done?
           What problem were you trying to solve?
           What haven't you said?
           What problem were you trying to solve?

             PROPOSED HCO BULLETIN OF 6.6.66 (CONFIDENTIAL)

                     POWER PLUS RELEASE - 5A PROCESSES

                This consists of three processes - 1B, 1C and 1D.

                There are two steps to each process:

                1. Listing question for 1B "What person have you
                                             known?"
                   Listing question for 1C "What place have you
                                             known?"
                   Listing question for 1D "What subject would you
                                             like to know more about?"

                Continue list until there is at least one BD item.
      Do not run an item that has not blown down as the pc gave it.

                2.  Using the terminal found on list: run:

                    What have you done to . ..........   ?
                    What problem were you trying to solve?
                    What haven't you said to .........   ?
                    What problem were you trying to solve?

                When running places and subjects, the commands one
      and three are changed to What have you done in ........... ?
      What haven't you said in ........ ?

                End phenomena of each process is a floating needle.




      HCOB 11SEP68 - DATA ON PR PRs


                      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      Class VII
      Class VIII    HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1968
      Confidential
                             DATA ON PR PRs


                NEVER NEVER run or Rehab Pr Prs on a person after
      they are Clear.  You will always mess up a case if you do.
      It's dangerous.

                On VA, letting pc Itsa instead or getting FN on the
      additional steps is a goof.  You take the first BD and handle
      it with No. 2 HCOB 6.6.66.  Do not let the pc list on and on.

                It happens that first BD on listing is the item on
      VA but on a rework during a Rehab they don't.  They have to
      be nulled.  HCOB on Laws of Listing must be followed.

                On clearing commands on VA you clear only the audit-
      ing commands.  The HCOB 6.6.66, No. 2, commands are only cleared
      once on 1B.  If you cleared them again for 1C and 1D, pc would
      suppress the question or the list.

                It pc gets ill after VA is complete, you should go
      over BA to get correct items, as the ones found are probably
      not correct.

                VA is best run in one go.

                It is possible when a Pr Pr is left unflat at end
      of session for the end phenomena to occur between sessions.
      It should always be checked next session.

                In running Power HIGH TA MEANS OVERRUN.

                When pc's TA goes up between sessions, you must bring
      it down with ruds or even GF if ruds don't bring it down.

                You will always find an ARC Break, PTP, M/W/H, Overt,
      Life Overrun, Self Auditing - something.  Could even be a coffee
      shop session.  Locate it.  Get TA down.

                The rule is:  DON'T START POWER OR ANY POWER PROCESS
      OR ANY GRADE PROCESS with the TA risen since last session or
      break.  GET IT DOWN FIRST.

                                             L. RON HUBBARD
      LRH:jp                                    Founder
      Copyright (c) 1968
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.





      HCOB 21FEB70 - END PHENOMEMA AND F/NS IN POWER


                      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS 0FFICE
                 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
      AOs
      SHs
      Power Pack
      Class VIII    HCO BULLETIN OF 21 FEBRUARY 1970
        Checksheet
      Class VII
        Checksheet            CONFIDENTIAL

                     END PHENOMENA AND F/NS IN POWER

                     (Your attention is called to
                      HCO B 20 February 70, "Floating
                      Needles and End Phenomena.")


             When I hear of Power being run - Pr Pr 4, 5 6 and the
      three steps of VA in ten minutes or so on a pc I wonder who
      is kidding.

             The purpose of Power is not to see how many pcs one
      can audit in an hour but TO GIVE LASTING GAINS TO THE PC.

             In the first place, the case has to be set up  or Power.
      All Dn Triples must have been run and the pc must have gone
      whole track.  Without Whole Track, don't expect Power or any-
      thing else to last.

             All Scn triples must have been successfully run.

             Any and all preparatory actions to make the case sure
      of full gains and all psycho-somatic illnesses must have been
      handled by auditing.

             Given these requisites, one comes to Power.

             Each Power process has its own End Phenomena - Pr Pr
      4, 5 and 6.

             You don't audit Power to just an F/N.  You audit it to:

             1.  F/N.
             2.  The End Phenomena for that Power Process.
             3.  VGIs.

             The old saw "All auditors talk too much" was never
      truer than in Power.

             The first F/N you see on the process in Power finds the
      pc still introverted (looking inward).

             If you just carry on - maybe one more command or so -
      you will see the pc hit the end phenomena and extrovert.

             Then VGIs will come in.

             The F/N will broaden widely and really float.

             Now tell him his needle is float1ng if you 1ike.  Rut
      don't use "I would like to indicate to you your needle is
      floating" to chop off the end phenomena!

                            Speed and Result

             Somewhere somebody got the idea that a "really good
      auditor can go from 0 to IV in 15 minutes" and "Pr Pr 4 to VA
      IC in 20 minutes."

             Speed has nothing to do with it.  As long as you don't
      have a pc waiting for commands, speed is a worthless commodity
      in auditing.

             One audits for results.

             The results of Pr Pr 4, 5 and 6 are the End Phenonena.
      Each of these 3 processes has its own particular end pnenomena
      and if that isn't obtained YOU HAVE NOT DELIVERED POWER.

             I re-researched all this very recently and these end
      phenomena occur shortly after the first appearance of the F/N.
      And when they occur you get a really wide float and a very
      happy pc.

             The pc may or may not say what happened but he sure will
      extrovert (look outward) sometimes with awe. Well, awe is not
      VGIs.  What you really see is relief and then VGIs.

             So let him get his end phenomena.

             If you don't you leave a bit of charge there, by-passed,
      which can result in an ARC Break later with Scientology.  ARC
      Breaks are by-passed charge.

             And did you know that the first beginnings of an F/N are
      often an ARC Break coming off the incident or bank? The pc goes
      rapidly uptone as the F/N widens.

             So don't sell the team out.

             Run Power:

             1.  F/N.
             2.  End Phenomena.
             3.  VGIs
                                           L. RON HUBBARD

                                           FOUNDER
      LRH:jz
      Copyright (c) 1970
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





      HCOB 21SEP70 - LP-1


                      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

                    HCO BULLETIN OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1970
                                Issue II
      Non Remimeo
      SH's & AO's Only
      For Class VII
        and Class VIII Only
      Add to Checksheets
        and Power Pack
                                  LP-1

                This is a Power Process correction list for Power
      Processes 1 to 6.  It is not used for Power Plus.  Use only
      where Power Processes 1 to 6 have bogged badly.  This list is
      NOT necessarily done to a Floating Needle but to get the case
      moving on Power.  It should NOT be used extensively so that
      the EPs of the Power Processes occur while doing the list.

                1.  Anything cut short?
                2.  Something distract you?
                3.  Distracted by Auditor?
                4.  Gone exterior?
                5.  Flattened out of session?
                6.  Awareness changes out of session?
                7.  Cognited out of session?
                8.  Loss of gain?
                9.  Some one enturbulate you?
               10.  Something else wrong?
               11.  ARC Break?  (Or upset by anything?)
               12.  PTP?  (Or problem?)
               13.  Anything been missed?
               14.  Over run?
               15.  Unnecessary action?

                                          Training and Services
                                          Aide for
                                          L. RON HUBBARD
                                          FOUNDER
      LRH:JR:rr
      Copyright 1970
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
